Saturday, October
21, 2000
Third-party candidates shift votes
Hopefuls take
on others by offering differences
By Michael Knock
Iowa City Press-Citizen
When
Iowans cast a vote for president of the United States on Nov.
7, they will have more names to choose from than Democrat Al
Gore or Republican George W. Bush.
Joannes
Pool, a senior art student at the University of Iowa,
stands in front of a coffin at a mock burial of democracy
on the UI campus. Students for Green Party candidate Ralph
Nader held the funeral to protest the exclusion of third-party
candidates in recent debates.lPress-Citizen/Danny
Wilcox Frazier
|
Listed among those more familiar names will be those such as
John Hagelin of the Natural Law Party, Harry Browne of the Libertarian
Party and Ralph Nader of the Green Party. In all, nine parties
will appear on Iowa's presidential ballot.
Though not household names, these candidates might hold the
key to the presidency.
With
polls showing the two frontrunners in a statistical dead heat,
experts say a few votes thrown to a third-party candidate could
change the outcome of the election.
The
stakes also are high for the third parties themselves. Parties
and candidates who receive at least 5 percent of the vote are
eligible to receive general-election funding. That money comes
from the campaign finance check-off that appears on federal
income tax forms.
For
example, Reform Party candidate Pat Buchanan received $12.6
million in federal funds, an amount that was based on H. Ross Perot's performance
in the 1996 election when he received 9 percent of the popular
vote.
In
Iowa, party status is given only to those parties able to win
at least 2 percent statewide. Currently, Iowans only can register
as Democrat, Republican or no party.
The
latter factor is one of the reasons former Iowa City councilor
Karen Kubby is supporting Ralph Nader this year.
"If
Nader gets 2 percent of the vote in Iowa, I'll be able to register
as a member of a third party," Kubby said. "I would be very
happy to have a 'G' next to my name."
Generating support
Kubby said she first got involved in third-party movements
in 1980 when she joined the Socialist Party USA. Issues were
the deciding factor that led her to eschew the two main parties
for a relatively small and unknown third party.
"I
read their platform, and I knew that I had found my political
home," Kubby said. "Their positions on civil rights and the
economic system ... ending support for corporate welfare, making
sure workers have a large say in their work life were all positions
close to my own."
Kubby has written a campaign training manual and has held workshops
for third-party candidates in Seattle, Madison, Wis., and Iowa
City to help candidates get their campaigns off the ground.
"Many of them aren't used to raising money," Kubby said. "They
don't know how to get out the vote."
In
contrast, Christy Ann Welty of Solon said her stance on gun
rights led her to join the Libertarian Party in 1997. She is
the chairwoman for the Johnson County Libertarian Party and
is challenging Democrat incumbent Ro Foege for State House,
50th District.
"I
was never really involved in politics before," Welty said. "But
it seemed like our gun rights were disappearing pretty fast.
(Libertarians) stand for personal responsibility and personal
liberty."
Other third-party supporters are newcomers.
Mei-ling Shaw, 20, of Iowa City, said she was drawn to the
Libertarian Party by watching the news when she was growing
up.
"In
my formative years, there were things like Waco and Ruby Ridge,"
Shaw
said. "They were played off as psychos by the media. But they
were just living out there not hurting anyone. They were killed
without a trial."
Others said they became members of third parties after growing
dissatisfied with the two major parties.
Zach
Rocker, a University of Iowa senior from Bettendorf, for example,
said he originally was a Bill Bradley Democrat before switching
to Nader and the Green Party.
"Gore has compromised himself too much on environmental issues,"
Rocker said. "He's basically centered himself."
Rocker was one of about 12 UI students who made the five-hour
trip Oct. 17 to St. Louis to protest the presidential debates
that featured Gore and Bush but ignored third-party candidates
such as Nader and Pat Buchanan.
The
bipartisan commission that governs presidential debates requires
that a candidate's support in nationally recognized opinion
polls be at least 15 percent before he or she can participate
in the debates.
Rocker said that requirement was unfair.
"By
showing up, a number of people can see that the Federal Elections
Commission is a joke," Rocker said. "Fifteen percent is pretty
high."
Can they win?
American history is littered with third parties whose flame
burned brightly once, until it was extinguished by the two-party
system. From the James Birney's anti-slavery Liberty Party of
the 1840s to Henry Wallace's Progressives in 1948, only the
Republican Party has been able to break through to major party
status.
UI
Professor Arthur Miller, director of the Heartland Poll, says
there's a reason for that.
"We
usually have third-party movements when there's a lot of angst
in the population," Miller said. "Right now, there's no burning
issues out there. People are doing quite well. Even in the Midwest
where farm prices are low, people are doing fairly well."
Miller predicts that Nader will get between 1 percent and 2
percent on election day. But that doesn't mean third parties
have no effect.
"Third parties do affect the agenda and get the other parties
to address issues they might not normally address," Miller said.
Moreover, third-party members say they are sensitive to charges
that a vote for their candidates is a wasted vote. The Green
Party, which gets most of its support from the left wing of
the political spectrum, has been hit especially hard by charges
that voting for Nader will ensure Bush's election.
"Yes, Gore is the lesser of two evils," said David Cobb, leader
of the Texas Green Party, during a September stop at UI. "But
who says I should have to vote for any type of evil?"
Kubby agrees.
"I
don't want to live my life in a fear based manner," Kubby said.
"I want my decision to be hope based and not fear based."
Shaw
said she knows Browne will not be elected president, but the
work she is doing now might help build a foundation for change.
"If
the media pays more attention, more people may realize they
want actual change," Shaw said. "That's how anything starts.
You can't start at the top."
Let
us know what you think of this story...
|